Contract farming

Contract farming

• It is For both subsistence and commercial crops. Namely The commercial crops like sugarcane, cotton, tea, coffee etc.

• Even in the case of some fruit crops and fisheries, contract farming arrangements, involving mainly the forward trading of commodities have been observed.

• However, in the wake of economic liberalization, the concept of contract farming in which national or multinational companies enter into contracts for marketing of the horticultural produce and also provide technologies and capital to contract farmers has gained importance.

• According to this, bipartite agreements are made between the farmer and the company and the latter contributes directly to the management of the farm through input supply as well as technical guidance and also markets the produce.

• The main features of this type of contract farming are that selected crops are grown by farmers under a buy back agreement with an agency engaged in trading or processing.

• In such cases, the centralized processing and marketing agencies supply technology and resources, including planting materials and occasional crop supervision.

• Under such contracts, the farmer assumes the production related risks, which the price risk is transferred to the company.

• In some cases, the company also bears the production risk, depending on the stage of crop growth at which the contract is made.

• If the contract is made at flowering or fruiting stage, the company bears the production risks also.

• In any case, the company bears the entire costs of transaction and marketing.

• It is this variant of contract farming which is said to be one of the ways by which small farmers can participate in the production of high value crops like fruits, vegetables, flowers etc. and benefit from market led growth.

How can small farmers benefit from Contract Farming ?

• Small farmers in India are generally capital starved and cannot make major investment in land improvement and modern inputs.

• Contract farming can fill up this gap by providing the farmers with quality inputs, technical guidance and management skills.

• Although the company deals only with the contract crop, the farmers’ overall management skill may improve, thereby helping him to raise the yields of both contract and non-contract crops.

• From the standpoint of corporate bodies, farming reduces the supply risk, while the farmers enter into contractual arrangements with companies in order to minimize price risks.

• The company and the farmers enter into contracts to supply or purchase a specified quantum of the commodity at agreed prices.

• The agreed contract may be either formal or informal and may cover supply of inputs and marketing of output.

• By entering into contract, the company reduces the risk of non-availability of raw material and the farmer reduces the risk of market demand and prices of his produce.

• The inputs and services supplied by firms may include seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, credit, farm machinery, technical advice, extension etc., or may involve only the supply of hybrid seeds and marketing of produce.

APMC Act and Contract Farming ?

• The Model Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act circulated by the Central Government to the States in 2003 for implementing marketing reforms has provisions for the registration of contract farming sponsors and recording of contract farming agreements with the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) or a prescribed authority under the Act, protection of title or rights of the farmers over the land under such contracts, dispute settlement mechanism and a model draft agreement suggesting various terms and conditions. To help States in the formulation of Rules in this regard, the Ministry of Agriculture has also circulated a set of Model APMC Rules to them for adoption.

• By now, relevant provisions have been made by several State Governments/ UTs in their respective APMC Acts for providing a legal framework to contract farming.

Success Stories of Contract farming in India ?

• Contract farming is becoming an increasingly important aspect of agribusiness, whether products are purchased by multinationals or by smaller companies.

• There are few success stories on contract farming such as Pepsico India in respect of potato, tomato, groundnut and chili in Punjab, Safflower in Madhya Pradesh, oil palm in Andhra Pradesh, seed production contracts for hybrids seed companies etc. which helped the growers in realization of better returns for their produce.

• Other success stories of contract farming are Amul and NDDB for milk procurement, sugarcane cooperative in Maharashtra, and prawn-acqua culture in Andhra Pradesh.

• In our country this approach has considerable potential where small and marginal farmers can no longer be competitive without access to modern technologies and support. The contractual agreement with the farmer provides access to production services and credit as well as knowledge of new technology. Pricing arrangements can significantly reduce the risk and uncertainty of market place

ISSUES WITH CONTRACT FARMING IN INDIA?

• Studies have highlighted a significant problem in some cases wherein

• Both firms and farmers breached contracts when market conditions provided arbitrage opportunities.

• Firms rejected more contracted produce on quality grounds when market prices dipped below contracted prices

• Farmers engaged in side-selling in open markets when market prices rose higher than contract prices.

• Companies prefer medium and large farmers because of transaction costs. They want farmers to dedicate a minimum acreage, say, five acres [one acre is 0.4 hectare] of land, to the contract crop. In India, 85 per cent of the farmers are marginal or small, operating less than two acres. In fact, 66 per cent operate less than one acre each.

• How many will have such land to give for contract crops?

• Contract farming can work if there is a collectivisation of small farmers. For instance, 10 to 15 farmers get together, form a group, and sign a group contract. It brings down the transaction costs, the farmers are better protected, and it is essentially a win-win situation for both the farmer and the corporate. It has been successful in Thailand. In fact, the Thai government planned it out and made it a part of the country’s national development plans.

How can contract farming be successful?

• It will work if the farmers have better bargaining power.

• They have to be legally protected.

• Furthermore, in contract farming, it is extremely important to understand the contracting operations.

• The terms and conditions of the contract are crucial.

• It has been found that quite often the farmer had not even seen the contract and did not know what the terms and conditions were.

• The contracts need to be more transparent.

When and how did this form of farming evolve in India, where agriculture practices have largely been traditional?

• Contract farming has been there since the 1960s in seed production, in both private and public sectors.

• Also, since the Land Ceiling Act does not permit non-farmers to own land, there is no other way to get specified produce than through contract farming.

• So as market demand changed in the 1980s and 1990s, contract farming became more common, starting with Pepsi in Punjab in tomatoes and potatoes in the mid-1990s as a first case of perishable-produce contract farming, other than a few other cases in some other crops elsewhere in India.

• Further, the amendments to the APMC [Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee] Act at the State levels in the last decade, which made contract farming legal, led to its widespread adoption across crops and regions and companies.

• What are the risks and benefits the farmer faces in contract farming?

• One is simple procurement;

• The buyer provides some inputs and takes the crop according to the terms and conditions of the contract

• The buyer provides inputs and planting schedules and is more involved in the agricultural process. The last one carries the most liability for the company.

• The pros are the high yields and fixed prices.

• The cons, however, are there as both production risk and market risk.

• Production costs in contract farming are higher as the standard expected is higher.

• No company offers protection for crop failure.

• No crop insurance is given and thus production risk is not covered most of the time.

• As said earlier, many companies take advantage of the clauses in the contract in case the harvest does not meet their requirement; they tend to buy it at a lower price or reject it altogether.

• Thus, market risk is also not covered fully, especially when the contract prices are based on market prices, as we know that the market prices vary substantially during the season or even during the day.

• If your contract document is not fair, how can your practice be fair?

• Can CORPORATE farming be a reality in India?

• Legally, corporate farming cannot exist in India.

• A non-farming entity is not allowed to own land.

• The Land Ceiling Act does not permit it.

• It has not been viable most of the time.

• There have been some companies that have attempted to lease land and cultivate crops but have not met with as great a reward as expected.

• Some States have leased out so-called wastelands to some companies for corporate farming but owing to local opposition, this has stopped now.